by preet
Comments for Environmental Problems Essays
|
||
|
||
|
||
by Ehsangh
Some people think that they can make as much noise as they want, while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled.
Discuss both views and include your own opinion and examples.
It is unfortunately the case that in any society we can find a number of people who do not respect to the social rights of others. One of the most disturbing cases is making noise either in public or people's private life. While the majority of people believe that the amount of noise produced by individuals must be restricted, there are still people who think that they have freedom to make noise regardless of considering other's life. In this essay, I will explain my point of view by examining both sides of the argument.
Some people think that they should not take any responsibility related to limiting or decreasing the noise made by them. They claim that controlling the amount of the noise by rules and regulations not only invades their personal privacy, but it violates their social freedom. For example, in their view, listening to music loudly or hosting night parties in their own apartments would be considered as their basic human rights of being happy.
There is, however, a strong argument that it is the responsibility of all members of a society to respect others' social life. Most people object to disrupting other's life by making unlimited noises. They believe that making noise should be controlled as much as possible when it creates disturbance for others by regulating strict rules. A common example here is to prohibit talking over cell phones loudly in the public such as in a subway which is clearly creating disturbance for people who are near the person while it has been frequently happening.
In my view, any type of activity that creates disturbance for citizens' life must be controlled, and noise is no exception. Although it is beyond the power of governments to control all disturbing noises in the whole society, it seems to be possible that making some avoidable noises is banned in certain places such as near hospitals.
Comments for Noise Pollution
|
||
|
||
by long
(hong kong)
Please give me some comment on my environmental problems essay, especially on grammatical mistakes, thank you
Should global environmental damage be managed by the government or individuals?
with the rapid development of modern world, global environment hazards are brought to our attention, some people suggest that the government should play a more important role on reducing the environmental damage, while others believe that the individual efforts cannot be ignored.
to begin with, one of the major environmental hazards is the uncontrolled greenhouse gases emission by burning fossil fuel. in order to tackle the problem, the government plays a vital role. for example, the united nations have reached the agreement on annual carbon emission even china has promised to reduced the emission to international standard. it is obvious that the government has the power to alter others attitude towards environmental issue, which can be use to minimise carbon emission.
on top of this, government can effectively prevent deforestation by reinforcing law and employing heavy punishment to offenders. in some rural countries, where people rely on logging business, the industry cut down trees incautiously and leads to serious rainforest destruction. if strict regulations are applied by the authority, the natural environment can be preserved.
however, individual can also make a great deal of effort on reducing impact by altering their lifestyle. the air quality would be greatly improved if people are willing to use public transport instead of private cars. landfill will be prolonged if people abandon the use of plastic as packaging materials and seek eco friendly alternatives. if people have the conception of recycling, the amount of pollutants produced will be significantly reduced.
on a whole, the government plays a crucial role on this worldwide issue. however, the individual influence cannot be underestimated.
Comments for Managing Global Environmental Damage
|
||
|
||
by han4
Many people believe that companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment in proportion to the amount of pollution they have produced.
Do you agree or disagree?
Over the past decades of ecological history, various environmental problems that the world faced; some may due to natural catastrophe, but most of them are caused by human activities. As a result, many countries have to bear with pointless expenditure to rejuvenate the state of their environment. Some people argued that every individual inclusive company is obliged to pay the cleaning cost of their actions that lead to environmental degradation, while others believed that certain actions are just unavoidable. This essay will present both sides of arguments before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
To begin with, Go Green defenders claimed that everyone should be penalized for their doings that caused environmental problems. Although this may be true to certain extent, however, some of the contamination results from human actions are just inevitable. In the modern era, many daily activities require energy to operate. Most of the energy that human used such as fuel and coals, contain with combustible materials, which will contribute to the environment pollution. Despite the existence of renewable and clean energy, this technology is still expensive at the moment and not every individual can afford to have. Hence, putting these costs and blames on these low level incomes groups will definitely burden them.
However, certain activities that harmed the environment are primarily motivated for self-interest. This can be easily evident from irresponsible companies that earned large profits from their noncompliance’s activities such as over logging. Another great example is where household family discarded unwanted objects or food recklessly just to avoid paying disposal or cleaning fee. All these self-centeredness actions have caused serious global warming. Thus, by imposing penalty on these selfish deeds, government can utilize this fund to restore and improve the ecosystem.
To sum up, there are clear supporting reasons for both sides of views; however, in my opinion, it is still believed that preserving the ecosystem is a responsibility of every person. Hence, any egotistical actions that resulted to environmental damage, they should be liable for the cost of rehabilitation flora and fauna.
Return to IELTS Essay Feedback Forum.
by Arvind Sharma
(India)
Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment.
What can government do to address these problems?
What can individual people do?
Over many decades, human beings have been damaging the ecosystem, but it has always been criticized the ways in which they are damaging the environment. It is essential to understand these different methods which are responsible in polluting the environment. In this essay, all possible ways of damaging the environment will be examined before pointing out the roles of government and an individual in this pressing matter.
To begin with the numerous means which cause the ecosystem polluted and destructive. Firstly, the deforestation where humans continually cutting down the trees for making the room for the living or constructing the new houses. As a result, many countries are being affected by flood and other natural disasters. Secondly, in order to fulfil the needs of the people, factories and mills are emitting the carbon which causes the ozone layer is being damaged. Consequently, the harmful rays are impacting adverse to the people’s health. Finally, the wastage, which is being collected by the people, is being poured into the soil which makes the land infertile. After examining the different ways, it has been clear that humans are responsible for making the environment worse.
Next, the question is that what the government should do for addressing these acute problems. The government can play a pivotal role in order to highlight the issues of global warming. In other words, people can get familiar with the negative effects of global warming by organizing the government funded awareness camps. Moreover, media can play an important role by having the collaboration with government to address the pressing issues of damaging environment on television. On the other hand, people can control their habits which cause the environment polluted. For instance, by avoiding the usage of plastic bags they can save the environment from pollution to some extent. In addition to this, they can control their desires which cause the factories and mills to produce more to fulfill their demands. Therefore, undoubtedly, if both government and an individual understand their responsibilities towards the environment, it can be saved from the destruction.
In conclusion, after analyzing the different ways of damaging the environment, and the significant roles of the government and an individual. I opine that this problem cannot be solved to think in isolation, therefore, it is important to both government and individual should come forward and take a responsibility to alleviate this extreme problem otherwise they have to live with the consequences of it.
Return to IELTS Essay Feedback Forum.